ISTOÉ DINHEIRO

12/04/2006  

                                              Unofficial Translation (Please make due allowance)

 

 HARDEEP SINGH PURI

 

“TOGETHER, WE HAVE A POTENTIAL SO BIG AS CHINA’S ONE”

 

Ambassador of India talks about growth, modernisation and market opening. And, also, he proposes the formation of an economic axle linking India, Brazil and South Africa

By  Gustavo Gantois

For the first time in its history, India has a Prime-Minister with the surname Singh, member of the caste of Sikhs, those ones with beard and turban that are the backbone of the Indian Army, intellectuality & science. Not by coincidence, the new Indian Ambassador has just arrived in the country with the same surname: Hardeep Singh Puri. The Prime-Minister sees Diplomat Singh as one of his men of confidence. Leader of one of the most growing economies in the globe, the Prime-Minister designated the diplomat to consolidate an strategic alliance between India, Brazil and SA. “Together, we have a potential so big as China’s one”, says the new Ambassador. 54-yrs-old, fluent in Japanese, Singh Puri already rehearses the first words in Portuguese. “I am learning it step by step”, says with simplicity. With a reputation of extraordinary negotiator, he spent more than 10 years in Geneva, changing positions at the United Nations, as a mediator in disputes at the World Trade Organisation. In Brasilia for three months, he already plans a 3-time-increase at the trade flow between India and Brazil, currently in US$ 2.3 bn. Check the main points of his interview.

DINHEIRO: ARE INDIA AND BRAZIL PARTNERS OR RIVALS?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: I always say we are twin souls. Brazil and India have common interests and challenges. We are developing countries that are scratched by the problem of poverty. I would not say that Brazil does not have anything we have. What we can say is that Brazil needs to start exploring more the opportunities, especially the businesses, which are running throughout the world. Investment is an intriguing thing. When everything is fine, it is by your side. When things start getting bad, it flies away in the first signal.

DINHEIRO: BUT INDIA HAS BEEN REGISTERING INVESTMENT LEVELS EVEN LOWER THAN BRAZIL’S ONES.

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Indeed. This is an example that nothing lacks for Brazil. Last year, we had an US$ 8-bn-amount in FDI. You had US$ 12.5 bn. Maybe Brazil needs a little more promotion: to organise big delegations of businessmen to check the potentialities of the country. I know you are looking for partners to finance infrastructure constructions, I also know you need more investments in energy sector. But the question is: do businessmen know about it?

 DINHEIRO: AND WHAT IS INDIA DOING DIFFERENTLY?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Once more, I remind you my definition of twin souls. Don’t be shocked, but we have a US$ 250 bn- infrastructure deficit for the next five years. We need investments in energy sector, highways, railways, airports and system of public transportation. The difference is that we want everyone to know about it. Other day I was in Miami and I saw the new constructions of Miami Int’l Airport. I found it so impressive that I stopped to see the hoarding of the responsible technical construction company. They were from Odebrecht. As soon as I reached the country, I visited Governor (Geraldo) Alckmin in S. Paulo. We got a deal and we will carry a big delegation of construction companies to know about our projects. Odebrecht would do a very good job there. Indeed, their presence would be an honour for me.

DINHEIRO: BUT THE COMPANIES MAY NOT FACE ALL THIS AMOUNT OF INVESTMENTS ALONE. WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Resources of such amount cannot be financed by the companies alone. Nor by the public sector. We are trying to find partnerships in order to spark projects like PPPs Brazil idealised. It is all set in India. All judicial background is legalised and some partners are already looking for us.

DINHEIRO: OTHER FIELD THAT IS ATTRACTING THE WORLD’S ATTENTION TO INDIA IS THE PREPARATION OF HUMAN RESOURCES. WHAT IS BEING DONE?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: In this field, there is no innovation or magic or innovation. What people have to understand is that there is no skilled workmanship without education. And we treat such subject as a priority of State. I would not be exaggerating if I tell you that 30% of our budget is for this field. And more: our emphasis is in basic education. Basic education is the one that determines what each person may reach in mature life. It does not mean we neglect higher studies. We really made a revolution in this area. We have five great universities dealing exclusively with technology. You should see they are Universities and not Faculties. This has been reverting the exodus of great scientists to the US. Now, when they don’t stay in India, they go and come back. They know our companies are absorbing such raw-material for the sustainability of a big economy. We are proud of what we did. But there are lots to be done.

DINHEIRO: HOW SUCH INVESTMENT IS REFLECTED IN THE INDIAN GDP?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Nowadays, the sector of services has a 54%-slice of our GDP. However, the big problem we still see on it is that almost half of it comes from Bank of India’s actions. That’s why we are working to diversify this relationship. For example, the agricultural/ livestock sector has only a 20%-slice of the GDP. Currently, it is growing 2% p.y. – something unacceptable in a country where 60% of its population is directly dependable of it. So, we are working in agreements to develop the quality of our system, including agreements with Brazil. Embrapa is showing more and more interest to develop specific products for our reality.

DINHEIRO: BUT INDIA FACES ACCUSATIONS OF HAVING A SO-CLOSED MARKET.

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: And who are the ones who do not want to protect their markets nowadays? But our market is gradually opening. If we do a rough calculus, we opened our economy with a 20-year-delay if compared to China, for example. And they are not that open market nowadays. We are working in the reduction of customs rates to reach the same levels of other Asian South-eastern countries. Besides, we carried on big structural reforms. Our economy is opened to FDI in the same proportion of the domestic investor. It does not happen in some sectors in Brazil, for example. Itau is due to opening its first branch in New Delhi. Step-by-step, we will reach a level that pleases foreign investors and doesn’t damage our businessmen.

DINHEIRO: AT THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION, INDIA IS ALWAYS ALIGNED WITH BRAZIL. HOWEVER, IN THESE LAST MONTHS, THERE ARE INCREASING RUMOURS THAT THE INDIANS ARE WORKING AGAINST G/ 20 INTERESTS. IS IT TRUE?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Brazil is one of the most important countries of this trade chessboard. The hard-work of Minister Celso Amorim was vital for the G/ 20 creation and, as a consequence, a great attention for the requests of the developing countries. In a minimalist point of view, we would be behaving thanklessly if we showed a different position than the one we are having till now. But, obviously, each country has specific interests. Whenever we work jointly, it does not damage an alliance at all.

 

 

 

 

“India will not be rich within 10 years, but will be among the leading ones”

 

 

DINHEIRO: IS IT IN THIS SENSE THAT YOU HAVE INSISTED IN THE CREATION OF INDIA-BRAZIL-SOUTH AFRICA AXLE?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: This is an important subject. To start, I think it is an absurd thing not to have a direct connection among the three countries. It is unacceptable to go from New Delhi to Sao Paulo via Frankfurt, and not via Johannesburg, for example. I am talking about 13 million Indians that travel overseas and that would love to visit Brazil. Now, in the economic point of view, I think we could treat one another with more attention. I am not telling we should break all negotiations with the US or the EU. But we should establish a certain priority to countries more tuned to our interests. This axle I call IBSA, has a potential as big as China’s in the new global economic reality. Even more, if we analyse it deeply. We want and need investments, we have workmanship ready to overcome structural hurdles and a giant consuming mass. The world is looking at us. They are just waiting our initiative.

 

DINHEIRO: BUT BEFORE CREATING A NEW BLOC, A BILATERAL APPROACHING WOULDN’T COME FIRST?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Indeed. This is my mission in Brazil. Yesteryear, our trade flow reached US$ 2.3 bn. And this figure doubled in comparison with the previous year. It doesn’t exist! The organisations of both countries have to strengthen ties. When we reach the US$ 5 bn-level, it will not be an appropriate amount. The Brazilian agriculture is three times bigger than ours. As how I said, we have to grow in this area. We have been growing at an annual rate of 8% and Brazil is growing at a rate of 3%. You have the capacity to increase it three times! And we want to join this game.

DINHEIRO: ANY SPECIFIC INTEREST?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: Recently I spoke with Eduardo Pereira de Carvalho (Head of the Sao Paulo Union of Sugarcane Agroindustries) and we expressed our interest in Brazil’s ethanol programme. Currently, only 9 Indian states add alcohol to the gasoline. We do not do more because the sugar consumption is so high due to the size of our population. We want to invest heavily in this sector. If we do not have how to invest in sugarcane plantations, we can do it with importations of Brazilian ethanol. Other big Indian interest is in the aeronautics sector. We closed a deal with Embraer to buy 5 Legacy with a right to purchase other 15 in post-selling system. But the reality we need 100 aircrafts a year! We are also in talks with Petrobras to double the efforts in the field of petrol & gas. As you can see, the interests are not few.

DINHEIRO: RECENTLY IN AN ARTICLE, PRIME-MINISTER MANMOHAN SINGH SAID THAT POVERTY IN INDIA SHOULD FINISH WITHIN 10 YEARS. IS IT A PROMISE OR THERE ARE EFFECTIVE MEANS FOR SUCH ACHIEVEMENT?

HARDEEP SINGH PURI: It is not like this. As in Brazil, we have challenges in this field. It is not fair to compare the GDPs of both countries, as your per capita income is almost 5 times greater than ours. I prefer being in a situation of saying that the per capita income is greater than GDP. That’s why we are working for a better income distribution. We have more than 260 million Indians living behind the line of poverty. Fortunately, population is increasing only 1.5% per year. Adding the growth of our economy with an increase at the social assistance net, we want the per capita income to increase 6.5% this year. This will not make us a wealthy country within 10 or 15 years. But it will surely put us in the first team of countries in the end of such period.

ISTOE DINHEIRO Fortnightly Magazine

Edition # 447, 12.4.2006

Pages 22-24